USPTO serial 90645925
THERMOSHOCK TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THERMOSHOCK TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DOWNERS GROVE, IL
Downers Grove, IL
Downers Grove, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven M. Espenshade
Steven M. Espenshade PIRKEY BARBER PLLC1801 EAST 6TH STREET, SUITE 300AUSTIN, TX 78702UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Household or kitchen utensils and containers; Cookware and tableware, except forks, knives and spoons, namely, pots, pans, and non-electric griddles; Combs; sponges for household purposes; dishwashing brushes; cleaning brushes for household use; brushes for basting meat; crumb brushes; Brush-making materials; articles for cleaning purposes, namely, cleaning cloths, rinsing buckets, mop buckets, mops, brooms, dustpans, dusters for cleaning, and rubber household gloves; Unworked or semi-worked glass, except building glass; beverage glassware, porcelain mugs and dishes, and earthenware mugs and dishes; bakeware; baking dishes; baking dishes made of earthenware; baking dishes made of porcelain; bone china tableware, namely, dinnerware; ceramic tableware, namely, dinnerware; ceramics for kitchen use, namely, dishes, roasting dishes, and bakeware; cooking pots; non-electric cooking pots and pans; cookware, namely, roasting pans and roasting dishes; cookware, namely, pots and pans; cookware for use in microwave ovens; dinnerware; dinnerware of porcelain; dishes; dishware; Dutch ovens; earthen pots; glass tableware, namely, glass dishes, and glass dish covers; oven-to-table tableware, namely, ovenware, dishes, and dish covers; ovenware; pizza stones; porcelain ware, namely, porcelain pots, porcelain pans, porcelain dishes, and porcelain dish covers; pots; roasting dishes; serving bowls; serving dishes; serving platters; serving pots; stone pots; tableware of porcelain, namely, porcelain dishes and porcelain serving bowls; ceramic bakeware for baking and serving; ceramic cookware for baking and serving, namely, ceramic ovenware; ceramic tableware for baking and serving, namely, ceramic bakeware; non-electric cooking pots and pans for baking and serving; cooking pots for baking and serving; cookware, namely, pots and pans for baking and serving; cookware and tableware for baking and serving, namely, ovenware and bakeware; dishes for baking and serving; Dutch ovens for baking and serving; earthen pots for baking and serving; glassware, porcelain and earthenware for baking and serving, namely, glass, porcelain and earthenware ovenware and bakeware; oven-to-table tableware for baking and serving, namely, ovenware, bakeware, dishes, and dish covers; porcelain ware for baking and serving, namely, porcelain ovenware and bakeware; pots for baking and serving; roasting dishes for baking and serving; stone pots for baking and serving; tableware of porcelain for baking and serving, namely, porcelain ovenware and bakeware; ceramic cookware, namely, ceramic ovenware; ceramic bakeware; ceramic cookware, namely, Dutch ovens, roasting dishes, sauce pots, pizza stones, and braisers; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INSTANT BRANDS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Corelle Brands LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Corelle Brands LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named THERMOSHOCK TECHNOLOGY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 12, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2023 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2023 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 22, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2023 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 27, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 12, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 17, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 27, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 8, 2022 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |