Drawing for ARANJUEZ

USPTO serial 90650875

ARANJUEZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HWANG, JOHN C B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARANJUEZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin W. Schiffmiller

Martin W. Schiffmiller KIRSCHSTEIN ISRAEL SCHIFFMILLER & PIERONI, P.C.425 FIFTH AVENUE 5TH FLOOR - SUITE 501NEW YORK, NY 10016-2223UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
015String winders, musical instruments, capos for musical instruments, cases for musical instruments, straps for musical instruments, stands for musical instruments, supports for musical instruments, tuners for musical instruments, guitars, guitar armrests, guitar bridges, guitar slides, guitar picksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 9, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2024EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2024AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 13, 2024TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 13, 2024NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 13, 2024PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 13, 2024PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2024EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 8, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2023NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2023DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 6, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 7, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 7, 2023DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2023ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 7, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 13, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 3, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 20, 2022ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 13, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance