USPTO serial 90652810
BUFFD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PORTARO, ALEXANDRA J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUFFD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Evanston, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan Wilmot
1730 SAWTELLE BLVD, APT 103LOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Web-based service related to blockchain-based non-fungible tokens (NFTs), including for creating, providing information about, selling, auctioning and trading NFTs; digital token exchange services; digital token trading; digital token transfer services; Web-based service relating to the buying and selling of unique digital trading cards; Web-based service for donating money to online streamers in exchange for receiving unique digital trading cards; Non-fungible tokens (NFTs); platform as a service (PAAS) featuring software platforms for providing access to crypto-collectibles, non-fungible tokens, digital trading cards, and other application tokens; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring software platforms for downloading software, data, and image files from the Internet; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in electronically trading, storing, sending, receiving, accepting and transmitting digital currency, crypto-collectibles, non-fungible tokens, digital trading cards, and other application tokens, and managing digital transactions; software as a service (SAAS) and platform as a service (PAAS) featuring software for use in connection with providing a digital platform for navigating digital art, crypto-collectibles, non-fungible tokens, digital trading cards, and other application tokens, and non-fungible token marketplaces and auctions; Software as a service (SAAS) and platform as a service (PAAS) featuring software for use in connection with providing information for digital art, crypto-collectibles, non-fungible tokens, digital trading cards and other application tokens; Providing online, non-downloadable virtual goods, namely, online non-downloadable computer programs for the creation and trade of digital digital trading cards, featuring online streamer; Providing a website featuring technology that supports video game streamers in promoting viewership and audience engagement | ACTIVE | Jul 22, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2021 | PMSD | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - DENIED | — |
| May 5, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 24, 2021 | TPMS | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR-MAKE SPECIAL-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |