USPTO serial 90654906
VIREO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HILLIARD, JESSICA LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIREO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R Menker
James R Menker HOLLEY & MENKER, PAPO BOX 331937ATLANTIC BEACH, FL 32233United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software and downloadable application software for mobile phones and computer tablets to access educational information on sustainable development and entrepreneurship, to exchange messages using chat lines, chatrooms and Internet forums and to display and transmit information about users' commitment and time devoted to hydroponic vegetables gardens and motion, temperature and liquid level information about hydroponic vegetable gardens | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing business information related to sustainable development, entrepreneurship, urban agriculture and agronomy via a website; business management consulting and advisory services, namely, business management support and advice in the field of sustainable development and entrepreneurship | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) featuring software to access educational information on sustainable development, entrepreneurship, urban agriculture and agronomy, to exchange messages using chat lines, chatrooms and Internet forums and to display and transmit information about users' commitment and time devoted to hydroponic vegetables gardens and motion, temperature and liquid level information about hydroponic vegetable gardens | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Hydroponic farming services; garden design services, namely, design of hydroponic vegetable gardens; garden design services, namely, design of hydroponic vegetable gardens that can be monitored through motion, temperature and liquid level sensors, through downloadable software and application for mobile phones and computer tablets and through software as a service (SaaS) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 9367-3176 Québec inc.
- Other trademarks owned by VIREO INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named VIREO
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 28, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 31, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |