USPTO serial 90657024
HUMANE HANDLING SCORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AURAND, KYLE C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HUMANE HANDLING SCORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Woodlands, Manitoba, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Audrey J. Babcock
Audrey J. Babcock TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP80 SOUTH 8TH STREET2200 IDS CENTERMINNEAPOLI, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable application for mobile phones, portable media players, handheld computers and related mobile devices in the field of livestock handling for weighing livestock and determining livestock disposition; downloadable livestock handling data software in the field of livestock handling for weighing livestock and determining livestock disposition | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Packaged meats | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | technical support services in the form of troubleshooting of hardware problems in the nature of repair of computer hardware in the field of livestock handling | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing online non-downloadable livestock handling data software in the field of livestock handling for weighing livestock and determining livestock disposition; performing studies and reports in the field of livestock handling in the nature of agricultural and livestock research services; electronic livestock handling data collection services in the nature of electronic monitoring of livestock weight and disposition using computers and sensors | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Consulting services on livestock handling procedures; providing report generation services in the field of livestock handling in the nature of providing livestock handling information in the form of reports; technical support services in the form of troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems in the field of livestock handling | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Northquip Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named HUMANE HANDLING SCORE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 6, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |