CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MSI INTERNATIONAL

USPTO serial 90658734

MSI INTERNATIONAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MSI INTERNATIONAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven M. Ayr

Steven M. Ayr CASNER & EDWARDS LLP303 CONGRESS STREETBOSTON, MA 02210United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016printed publications, namely, reports, newsletters, monographs and books in the area of marketingACTIVE—
036Financial sponsorship of academic research and conferences in the areas of marketing, managing customer experience, maximizing customer value over time, managing and monetizing customer data, strategies for growth, organizing for agility, managing change and disruption, innovation with respect to new product development and commercialization, measuring and managing corporate reputationACTIVE—
041Arranging and conducting educational conferences in the area of marketingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 18, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2024EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 16, 2024TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 16, 2024NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2024PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 16, 2024PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2024EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 13, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2024EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 12, 2024EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 12, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 18, 2024EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Mar 18, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2023EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 20, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2023TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 20, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2023PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 20, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2023EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 21, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2023EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2023TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 18, 2023PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2023EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 16, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 13, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2022TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 12, 2022PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 12, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 15, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 26, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2021GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 20, 2021GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 20, 2021CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 13, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance