USPTO serial 90660557
FORMFIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FORMFIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Saul Benjamin Abrams
Saul Benjamin Abrams FIELD LLP400 - 444 7 AVENUE SWCALGARY, AB, T2P0X8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Vehicle windshield sunshades; vehicle rear window sunshades; plastic parts for vehicles, namely, automotive exterior and interior plastic extruded decorative and protective trim; Metal parts for vehicles, namely, automotive exterior and interior metal decorative and protective trim; Auto accessories, namely, side mirror protective trim; Vehicle parts, namely, windshield visors; Sun shields and visors for motor vehicles; Car window shades; protective liners for cargo area of vehicles; motor vehicle mudguards; spoilers for motor vehicles; luggage carriers for vehicles; spare tire carriers for vehicles; vehicle roof boxes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 24, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |