USPTO serial 90660620
CONVERSATION CLOUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAW, CHRISTOPHER M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONVERSATION CLOUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly S. Grimsley
Kimberly S. Grimsley OLIVER & GRIMSLEY, LLC502 WASHINGTON AVENUESUITE 605TOWSON, MD 21204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation services; business advice and commercial information; business consultation and information in the field of targeted online advertising; business organization advice; providing commercial information and advice for consumers in the choice of products and services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Instant messaging services; Interactive online communication services, namely, providing on-line facilities for real-time interaction between businesses and their customers and potential customers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use by businesses to enable real-time communications with online customers through the use of coupons, ads, offers, video and other types of online content based on business rules and analytics about the visitors' online behavior; computer services, namely, hosting on-line web facilities for others for organizing, serving and conducting online interactive promotions, namely, coupons, ads, offers, video and other types of online content; Software as a Services (SAAS) services featuring software for providing interactive message services for customers and potential customers with businesses; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enabling businesses to provide and obtain customer support, to assist in providing customer engagement tools, marketing, customer care, online commerce, and messaging to customers, and for facilitating interaction, connections and digital messaging and chat conversations; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for facilitating interaction, connections, and conversations between users in the digital messaging, digital chat, and customer engagement fields; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for social media marketing and social media strategy and marketing consultancy; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for online social networking; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use by businesses for sales and customer service communications via on-line chats, communication, and business analytics services; computer services, namely, hosting on-line web facilities for others for organizing and conducting online and interactive discussions; computer services, namely, creating an on-line community for registered users to participate in discussions, get feedback from their peers, form virtual communities, and engage in social networking | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |