USPTO serial 90665155
CIAO BELLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, CAMERON L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CIAO BELLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Connie L. Ellerbach, Esq.
CONNIE L. ELLERBACH, ESQ. FENWICK & WEST LLP801 CALIFORNIA STREETSILICON VALLEY CENTERMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041-1990Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Vitamin preparations; medicines for human purposes; dietary fiber; medicinal tea; medicinal herbs; ferments for pharmaceutical purposes; Slimming tea; traditional Chinese medicine; medicated sweets; mineral food supplements; nutritional supplements; Vitamin jelly; protein dietary supplements; food for babies | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Edible fats; edible oils; Edible rice bran oils; pectin for culinary purposes; fruit jellies; jellies for food | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee; cocoa; coffee-based beverages; cocoa-based beverages; chocolate-based beverages; coffee capsules, filled; tea; flowers or leaves for use as tea substitutes; iced tea; tea-based beverages; chamomile-based beverages; sugar; rock candy; brown sugar; candy; chewing gum; chocolate; south sugar; honey; propolis; royal jelly; bread; cookies; pastries; oat-based food; sesame paste; Mooncake; sushi; steamed stuffed bun; dumpling; instant rices; bibimbap; freeze-dried dishes with main ingredient being rice; cereal preparations; flour; bean meal; corn flour; rice; groats for human food; corn, roasted; spaghetti; noodles; ramen; soba noodles; cereal-based snack food; rice-based snack food; ice cream; edible ices; sherbets; frozen yogurt; seasonings; spices; sauces | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |