USPTO serial 90672644
CREME DE LA CREME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GADSON, SHARI B.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CREME DE LA CREME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KIRBY DRAKE
Kirby Drake Kirby Drake Law PLLC3904A Elm StreetDallas, TX 75226UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Blanched nuts; Candied nuts; Chopped nuts; Flavored nuts; Prepared nuts; Processed nuts; Roasted nuts; Seasoned nuts; Shelled nuts, all of which are supplied to grocery chains and wholesale grocers | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Fresh nuts; Raw nuts, all of which are supplied to grocery chains and wholesale grocers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 5, 2023 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 31, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |