USPTO serial 90676828
WELLSPRING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, ELIZABETH YI HSUAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WELLSPRING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yaakov Y. Citrin, Esq.
Yaakov Y. Citrin, Esq. HARTMAN & CITRIN LLCPO BOX 421755ATLANTA, GA 30342UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business administration services in the field of providing employee wellness kits to employees of a customer including enabling the customer to select contents of the wellness kits from a list of approved products from approved vendors, mailing the kits to the employees of the customer, and providing a web site portal that enables employees to access promotions and discounts associated with the approved vendors | ACTIVE | Feb 4, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2023 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 20, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2022 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |