USPTO serial 90676992
WORKEZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURKE, JUSTINE N
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WORKEZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and computer peripherals; Computer mounts | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2010 |
| 020 | Furniture; Furniture chests; Furniture for camping; Furniture for children; Furniture frames; Furniture moldings; Furniture of metal; Furniture partitions; Furniture risers; Furniture shelves; Bamboo furniture; Bathroom furniture; Bedroom furniture; Bentwood furniture; Cabinets; Camping furniture; Computer furniture; Cushions; Custom furniture; Futons; Lawn furniture; Library furniture; Lounge furniture; Metal furniture; Metal furniture and furniture for camping; Office furniture; Outdoor furniture; Patio furniture; Pet furniture; Recliners; School furniture; Screens; Seating furniture; Seats; Stone furniture; Tables; Upholstered furniture | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2023 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2022 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |