USPTO serial 90681087
CARBONAI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLOWERS, JAY K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARBONAI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, AB, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ryan M. Kaiser
Ryan M. Kaiser AMIN WASSERMAN GURNANI LLP230 W. Monroe StreetSuite 1405Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Economic forecasting and analysis; Project management services for others for business purposes in the fields of greenhouse gas emission reductions project design and implementation; Inventory management of greenhouse gas data using earth orbiting satellite technology; Inventory management of greenhouse gas data using in-situ instrumentation; Inventory management of greenhouse gas data using aerial surveillance with both remotely controlled unpiloted aerial vehicles and conventional aircraft | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial forecasting | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Provision of services of management of greenhouse gas emissions, namely, methane gas reduction services utilizing a chemical process that operates on effluent gas streams from power plants and other sources that generate carbon dioxide | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Monitoring of greenhouse emissions data and related analytics services for scientific purposes; data monitoring and analysis of greenhouse gas data using earth orbiting satellite technology for scientific research purposes; data monitoring and analysis of greenhouse gas data using using in-situ instrumentation for scientific research purposes; data monitoring and analysis of greenhouse gas data using aerial surveillance with both remotely controlled unpiloted aerial vehicles and conventional aircraft for scientific research purposes; Provision of software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for verification of greenhouse gas emission reductions project design and implementation by third parties; Provision of software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for the purpose of tracking, auditing and verification of greenhouse gas emissions and carbon credits; Provision of software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for collection and storage of related files for greenhouse gas emission reductions project design and implementation by third parties; quality control services, namely, monitoring the performance of computer systems of others; greenhouse gas emission measuring and analysis | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Surveillance services of greenhouse gas data using earth orbiting satellite technology; Surveillance services of greenhouse gas data using in-situ instrumentation; Surveillance services of greenhouse gas data using aerial surveillance with both remotely controlled unpiloted aerial vehicles and conventional aircraft | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 6, 2025 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 6, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 23, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |