USPTO serial 90691800
LOWCLASS CLOTHING CO.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PULVERMACHER, TASHA NICOLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOWCLASS CLOTHING CO.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT D. SWANSON
SCOTT D. SWANSON SHAVER & SWANSON, LLPPO BOX 877BOISE, ID 83701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Beanies; Hats; Hoodies; Jackets; Shirts and short-sleeved shirts; Tank-tops; Baseball caps and hats; Hooded sweat shirts; Sweat shirts; T-shirts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 25, 2023 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 3, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2023 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 11, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 5, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 1, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 1, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 23, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |