CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ECO BASE

USPTO serial 90691986

ECO BASE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECO BASE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey D. Larson

Jeffrey D. Larson HOLLAND & HART LLPP.O. BOX 8749, TM DOCKETINGATTN: TRADEMARK DOCKETINGDENVER, CO 80201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Equipment used in oil and gas well improvement and/or completion services and oil or gas well hydraulic fracturing operations, namely, trailer mounted and body load high-pressure frac pumps, trailer mounted and body load blenders; high-pressure pumps used in oil and gas well servicesACTIVE—
037Hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas wells; oil and gas well pressure pumping services; oilfield services, namely, cementing well casing strings as part of the well construction process, hydraulic fracturing and acidizing of target geologic formations to enhance production of the well, and pump-down services used to perforate the production areas of horizontal wells; oil and gas reservoir enhancement services, namely, hydraulic fracturing of subsurface geologic formations to enhance well production; cementing services for oil and gas wells; oil and gas well enhancing services, namely, the injection of nitrogen and acid to oil and gas wells to increase the oil and gas recovery; remedial work on oil and gas wells, namely, re-hydraulic fracturing and re-cementing services; oil and gas well fracturingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 12, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 26, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 6, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 3, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 6, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 8, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance