USPTO serial 90695852
ONE-CORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, SHATONI ALEXANDRIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 302- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONE-CORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott S. Havlick
SCOTT S. HAVLICK HOLLAND & HART LLPP.O. BOX 8749ATTN: TRADEMARK DOCKETINGDENVER, CO 80201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Banking, payment, billing, remittance and funds transfer software; credit, debit and charge card management software; software in relation to e-commerce and e-commerce procurement services; software in relation to electronic communications services; software in relation to on-line processing and transactions management; software in relation to data security services including digital transaction and/or communication certification and/or authentication; software in relation to credit cards and debit cards; software designed to enable mobile communication devices containing an integrated circuit chip to interact with terminals and card readers; computer hardware, computer peripherals, mobile communication devices for use in electronic and wireless business and consumer transactions, namely, computer hardware, peripherals and mobile communication devices to facilitate payments by electronic and wireless means; computer hardware and mobile communication devices in the nature of devices containing an integrated circuit chip and proximity payment devices; computer hardware for encryption and secure data storage and retrieval and transmission of customer, account and transaction information used by individuals and financial institutions; telecommunications equipment, namely, electronic point of sale transaction terminals for transmitting displaying and storing transaction, identification, and financial information; electronic verification apparatus, namely, computer hardware for authenticating charge cards, bank cards, credit cards, debit cards and payment cards; magnetically encoded cards; chip cards; smart cards; integrated circuit cards; magnetic strips and memory chips | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial services including financial transaction services; electronic payment services; processing of financial transactions on-line via a computer database or via a global information network or via telecommunications or mobile devices or at the point of sale; banking services; information and advisory services related to the aforementioned services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |