Drawing for WHISPER

USPTO serial 90700031

WHISPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHISPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH AGOSTINO

JOSEPH AGOSTINO GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP500 CAMPUS DRIVESUITE 400FLORHAM PARK, NJ 07932-0677

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Mattress pads, bed sheets, mattress protectors being mattress covers, pillow protectors being pillow covers, pillow casesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 11, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 10, 2023ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 10, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 10, 2023EXDDEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED—
Jan 5, 2023DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 5, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 5, 2022GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2022GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2022CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 24, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 24, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 3, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2022DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2022ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 26, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 26, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 5, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 7, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 13, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance