USPTO serial 90700088
LINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOSCATI, JUSTIN RONALD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Boisbriand, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley M. Stohry
Bradley M. Stohry REICHEL STOHRY DEAN LLP525 S. Meridian St., Suite 1A2INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46225UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Industrial robots, Robotic arms for industrial purposes in the nature of industrial robots; robots for industrial uses being in the agricultural, logistic, food and energy industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Downloadable and recorded computer operating system software for operating robots or robotic arms; downloadable and recorded software for running development programs and application programs in a common development environment relating to the operation of robots and robotic arms; downloadable and recoded application framework software and application programming interface (API) software for robots for use in the agricultural and medical industries | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 29, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 27, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |