Drawing for BOTGUARD

USPTO serial 90701830

BOTGUARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAKSHOOD, AKEELA MOHAMED
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOTGUARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Benjamin S. White

Benjamin S. White IPLA, LLP4445 Eastgate MallSuite 200San Diego, CA 92121

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer application software for desktop computers, handheld computers, smart phones, embedded computer systems, namely, software for fraud activity detection in the fields of computer security, computer networks security, banking, and online advertising and commerce; Downloadable computer software and hardware for fraud activity detection in the fields of computer security, computer networks security, banking, and online advertising and commerce; Downloadable cloud computer software for fraud activity detection in the fields of computer security, computer networks security, banking, and online advertising and commerce; Downloadable computer software for fraud activity detection in the fields of computer security, computer networks security, banking, and online advertising and commerceACTIVE—
042Computer security services, namely, identifying, verifying and detecting the identity and origination of internet traffic of the websites of others for the purpose of preventing fraud and computer generated attacks on global computer networks in the field of computer security, computer networks security, banking, online advertising, marketing and commerce; computer security services, namely, identifying, verifying and detecting the identity and origination of internet traffic of the websites of others for the purpose of detecting fraud for electronic funds transfers, credit and debit card and electronic check transactions via a global computer network; computer security services namely, identifying, verifying and detecting the identity and origination of internet traffic of the websites of others for the purpose of detecting fraud for streaming services in the music and connected TV industries; computer security services, namely, identifying, verifying and detecting the identity and origination of internet traffic of the websites of others for the purpose of preventing fraud of website account takeover and credential stuffing attacks; computer security threat intelligence consultingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2023EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 20, 2023EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 20, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 17, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 15, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 16, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2023COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 20, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 26, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 6, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 8, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 13, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 13, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jan 6, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 14, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance