USPTO serial 90706399
21 OR NOTHING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 774
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 21 OR NOTHING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SEAN ULRICH
SEAN ULRICH MORRISON ROTHMAN LLP10900 WILSHIRE BLVD., SUITE 930LOS ANGELES, CA 90024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer game software, namely, software for playing various card games; Downloadable software for providing games of chance on a computerized gaming platform that enables electronic wagering; Downloadable computer application software for mobile devices, namely, software for playing online wagering and non-wagering games | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2017 |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, t-shirts and hats | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2014 |
| 028 | Electronic gaming devices, namely, gaming machines and computerized video table games for casino gaming purposes | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2017 |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing online computer games for play online; entertainment gaming services in the nature of casino gaming, namely, providing games for play at gaming establishments; entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable video games for play through mobile devices; entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable video games featuring specialized game cards or representations thereof; entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable video games featuring specialized game cards or representations thereof for play online, through mobile devices and at gaming establishments; entertainment services, namely, providing on-line wagering computer games for play online; entertainment services, namely, providing casino wagering games for play at gaming establishments; entertainment services, namely, providing on-line wagering computer games for play through mobile devices; entertainment services, namely, providing casino gaming wagering games featuring specialized game cards or representations thereof; entertainment services, namely, providing online wagering computer games featuring specialized game cards or representations thereof for play online, through mobile devices and at gaming establishments; Leasing of proprietary casino wagering gaming tables and specialized playing cards to gaming operators and gaming establishments | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES HOLDING, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES HOLDING, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by DAVID W. MAHON
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named 21 OR NOTHING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2025 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 15, 2023 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2023 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 31, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2023 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 13, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2022 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |