Drawing for CREALEV

USPTO serial 90708348

CREALEV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAPTER, ALAIN J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CREALEV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Leonard

Michael J. Leonard Fox Rothschild LLP997 Lenox Drive, Bldg. 3Lawrenceville, NJ 08648-2311United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009audio speakers; audio equipment for vehicles, namely, loud speakers for automotive audio systems; downloadable mobile applications using artificial intelligence for home automation; home automation systems comprised of computer hardware, wireless and wired controllers, and downloadable software for automating appliances, lighting, HVAC, security, and electrical power; Home automation systems comprising wireless and wired controllers, controlled devices, and software for lighting, HVAC, security, safety and other home and office monitoring and control applications; Computer hardware and recorded software systems for remotely controlling lighting devices within a buildingACTIVE—
011LED lighting systems, namely, LED modules, power supplies; LED (light emitting diodes) lighting fixtures for use in display, commercial, industrial, residential, and architectural accent lighting applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 30, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2025EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 25, 2025AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 25, 2024EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 25, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 24, 2024EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 24, 2024EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 24, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 24, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2023EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 22, 2023EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 22, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 26, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 24, 2023EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 24, 2023EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 24, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 24, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 22, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 22, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 24, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 29, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 9, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 21, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 10, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 17, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance