Drawing for LIANA

USPTO serial 90709054

LIANA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PURATH, ANICKA S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIANA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Trevor A. Caudle, Esq.

Trevor A. Caudle, Esq. TREVOR CAUDLE LAW PRACTICE, PC350 BAY STREET, #100-363SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Automated laboratory apparatus in the nature of a laboratory robot containing diagnostic test kits comprised of medical diagnostic reagents, antimicrobial susceptibility test panel, pipettes, culture fluids for cultivating bacterial cells, carriers for panel loading in the nature of laboratory trays, troughs, and integrated recorded operating system software, all of the forgoing being sold as a unit; Recorded computer software featuring technology that allows users to interface with an automated laboratory apparatus in order to analyze, interpret and report resultsACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of an online non-downloadable software platform, namely, platform as a service (PAAS) featuring a computer software platform that allows users to interface with an automated laboratory apparatus in order to analyze, interpret and report resultsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 9, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2024EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 9, 2024EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 9, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 18, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2024EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 17, 2024EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 17, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 19, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2023EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 17, 2023EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 17, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 4, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 2, 2023EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 2, 2023EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 2, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 28, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 10, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 15, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 23, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2022PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 4, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 3, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 1, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2022GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2022GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2022EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Jan 28, 2022CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jan 21, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 17, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance