Drawing for ESI

USPTO serial 90711453

ESI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PATEL, SAMIR RAMESH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ESI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GARY J. PITZER

GARY J. PITZER TAROLLI, SUNDHEIM, COVELL & TUMMINO LLP1300 E. 9TH STREETSUITE 1700CLEVELAND, OH 44114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Design, construction and installation of equipment and facilities for processing, storing and handling grain and feedACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2022MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 22, 2022ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 21, 2022EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance