USPTO serial 90715508
ABRACADABRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRIEDMAN, LESLEE ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ABRACADABRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Morris III
William J. Morris III DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC199 MAIN STREETBURLINGTON, VT 05401United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee; Cookies; Donuts; Pastries; Pies; Tea; Waffles; Bakery goods; Bakery products; Beverages made of coffee; Beverages made of tea; Coffee-based iced beverages; Coffee-based beverages containing ice cream (affogato); Coffee-based drinks; Coffee-based snack foods; Coffee beans; Coffee drinks; Coffee based beverages; Coffee-based beverages; Doughnuts; Herbal teas; Ice-cream; Ice cream; Iced coffee; Instant coffee; Tea-based beverages; Tea-based iced beverages; Beverages with a tea base; Ground coffee beans; Kombucha tea | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Fruit juices; Herbal juices; Non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices; Non-alcoholic beverages flavored with coffee; Non-alcoholic beverages flavored with tea; Non-alcoholic beverages flavoured with coffee; Non-alcoholic beverages flavoured with tea; Non-alcoholic beverages with tea flavor; Non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Coffee bars; Coffee shops; Coffee and tea bars; Juice bar services; Tea bars; Tea shops | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2025 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 12, 2025 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2025 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 5, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 13, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |