USPTO serial 90716597
PERSON OF THE YEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NUNLEY, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERSON OF THE YEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MIGUEL C. DANIELSON
MIGUEL C. DANIELSON DANIELSON LEGAL LLCONE MIFFLIN PL STE 400ATTN: TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATORCAMBRIDGE, MA 02138Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | SECTION OF AN ONLINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE MAGAZINE PUBLISHED ANNUALLY FEATURING INFORMATION ON SELECTED NEWSWORTHY INDIVIDUALS; PROVIDING A WEBSITE FEATURING EDUCATIONAL AND ENTERTAINMENT INFORMATION ON SELECTED NEWSWORTHY INDIVIDUALS | ACTIVE | Dec 27, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | EXDD | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 16, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 31, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |