Drawing for LIMITLESS MANUFACTURING

USPTO serial 90726563

LIMITLESS MANUFACTURING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OLSON, MACKENZIE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIMITLESS MANUFACTURING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christina M. Licursi

Christina M. Licursi WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.600 ATLANTIC AVENUEBOSTON, MA 02210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
0073D printers; 3D printers for manufacturing metal productsACTIVE—
009Downloadable and recorded computer aided manufacturing (CAM) software for 3D printers and for metal manufacturing machines; downloadable and recorded software designed for use in construction and automated manufacturing (CAD/CAM); downloadable and recorded software for use in 3D printing and custom manufacturingACTIVE—
042Scientific and technological services, namely, new product design and development services, in the field of laser treatment of materials and 3D printing; scientific research and technological consultation services in the field of technologies used in laser treatment of materials and 3D printing; scientific and technological research and new product design analysis services in the field of technologies used in laser treatment of materials and 3D printing for custom manufacturing of goods; providing a website featuring technology that enables the user to upload, modify, design, and order customer-manufactured parts on the internet, in the field of laser treatment of materials and 3D printingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 21, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 1, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 8, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance