Drawing for EKOBO

USPTO serial 90730546

EKOBO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- MANAGING ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EKOBO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JUSTIN CLARK

3100 WEST RAY ROAD, SUITE 201CHANDLER, AZ 85226UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Dishes, plates and bowls; cups; serving dishes and serving trays; and serving spoons and serving tongs; bathroom accessories, namely, soap boxes, soap dishes, tooth brush holders, bath sponges, soap dispensers, bathroom traysACTIVEMar 1, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2024MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 10, 2024EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 9, 2024ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 26, 2024EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 16, 2023RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Nov 1, 2023GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2023GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2023CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 5, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 3, 2023GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2023GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2023CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 22, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2023EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 12, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 12, 2023EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 11, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2023XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Mar 10, 2023XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 11, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 7, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2022PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 23, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 23, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 8, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 27, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance