Drawing for SEACRET FERMENT 21

USPTO serial 90732975

SEACRET FERMENT 21

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEACRET FERMENT 21?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jacqueline Zion

Jacqueline Zion PEARL COHEN ZEDEK LATZER BARATZ LLP7 TIMES SQUARENEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical compositions and additives for use in the manufacture of cosmetics; plant extracts, other than essential oils, for use in the manufacture of cosmetics; botanical extracts, other than essential oils, for use in making cosmetics; herb extracts, other than essential oils, for use in the manufacture of cosmetics; antioxidants for use in the manufacture of cosmeticsACTIVE—
003Non-medicated skin care products, namely, moisturizers, facial cleansers, facial peels, masks, lotions, ointments being ointments for skin, facial creams, facial and body scrubs, soaps, after shave, mud therapy being cosmetic mud masks and cosmetic body mud; hair care products, namely, shampoo, conditioner, hair serum, and hair masks; nail care products, namely, hand creams, cuticle oils; makeup preparations; all excluding deodorant and fragrance perfumeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 22, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 2, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 28, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance