USPTO serial 90734085
VB COSMETICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAROTTA, GABRIELLE CHRISTINA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VB COSMETICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID E ROGERS
DAVID E ROGERS SNELL & WILMER LLPONE EAST WASHINGTON STREETSUITE 2700PHOENIX, AZ 85004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Nail buffing preparations; Nail care preparations;, namely, Nail softeners; Nail cream; Nail enamel; Nail grooming products, namely, tips, glue, lacquer and glitter; Nail polish; Nail polish base coat; and Nail polish top coat | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2024 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 14, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 14, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 19, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |