USPTO serial 90734117
STARLINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARR, PATRICK C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STARLINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paulo A. de Almeida
Paulo A. de Almeida PATEL & ALMEIDA, P. C.16830 VENTURA BLVD., SUITE 360ENCINO, CA 91436United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | GPS tracking and navigation devices for vehicles; all of the foregoing only for use by business-to-business (B2B) companies, namely, fleet management service providers, insurance companies, Government bodies, and stolen vehicle recovery service providers in the field of telematics communication in land, water or air vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, providing access to satellite transmissions of audio and visual data for GPS navigation and location for vehicles; Providing user access to global positioning signals for navigation and location for vehicles; all of the foregoing only for use by business-to-business (B2B) companies, namely, fleet management service providers, insurance companies, Government bodies, and stolen vehicle recovery service providers, for telematic communication services, namely, tracking and location services in land, water or air vehicles | ACTIVE | Jan 25, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2026 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 7, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 24, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |