Drawing for DUOGUARD

USPTO serial 90735444

DUOGUARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACFARLANE, JAMES W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DUOGUARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher Kindel

Christopher Kindel PIRKEY BARBER PLLC1801 EAST 6TH STREET, SUITE 300AUSTIN, TX 78702UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005disinfectants; disinfecting wipes; sanitizing wipesACTIVE—
006manual dispensers of metal for disinfecting wipes; manual dispensers of metal for sanitizing wipesACTIVE—
020manual dispensers not of metal for disinfecting wipes; manual dispensers not of metal for sanitizing wipesACTIVE—
021manual dispensers for disinfecting wipes for household use; manual dispensers for sanitizing wipes for household use; mops; mops with disinfectant applicator; dispensers for disinfecting solutionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 28, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 28, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 28, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 9, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 29, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 12, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 18, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 20, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 20, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 29, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance