USPTO serial 90735861
FURIOSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WRIGHT, MARCO JABBAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FURIOSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sang Ho Lee
SANG HO LEE NOVICK, KIM & LEE, PLLC3251 OLD LEE HIGHWAYSUITE 500FAIRFAX, VA 22030Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Organic light-emitting diodes (OLED); quantum dot light-emitting diodes (QLED); photo-semiconductors; large scale integrated circuits; integrated circuits for use in digital signal processors; microchips; semiconductor testing apparatus; semiconductor component; semiconductor devices; semi-conductors; semiconductor elements; semiconductor wafers; electrical circuit boards; electronic integrated circuits; integrated circuits; chips being integrated circuit | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services relating to organic light-emitting diodes (OLED); retail store services relating to quantum dot light-emitting diodes (QLED); retail store services relating to photo-semiconductors; retail store services relating to large scale integrated circuits; retail store services relating to integrated circuits for use in digital signal processors; retail store services relating to microchips; retail store services relating to semiconductor testing apparatus; retail store services relating to semiconductor component; retail store services relating to semi-conductors; retail store services relating to semiconductor devices; retail store services relating to semiconductor elements; retail store services relating to semiconductor wafers; business intermediary services relating to mail order by telecommunications; retail store services relating to electrical circuit boards; retail store services relating to electronic integrated circuits; retail store services relating to integrated circuits; retail store services relating to chips being integrated circuits | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design of semiconductor chips for LCD; development of hardware for digital signal processing; microchip design services; product research, custom design, and testing for new product development regarding semiconductors; research services relating to semiconductors; technical research in the field of semiconductor design; design of semiconductors or integrated circuits; technical research in the field of semiconductor manufacturing; research in the area of semiconductor processing technology; design of semiconductor chips; design of electric circuit boards; development of computer hardware for the manufacturing industries; design of integrated circuits; integrated circuit testing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |