USPTO serial 90736479
SSIMPLUS STUDIO SCORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SSIMPLUS STUDIO SCORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Waterloo, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Young
James L. Young WESTMAN, CHAMPLIN & KOEHLER, P.A.121 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET, SUITE 1100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for quality of experience measurement, monitoring, analysis and optimization for video and audio content | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable software for quality of experience measurement, monitoring, analysis and optimization for video and audio content | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |