USPTO serial 90738817
ALBANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALBANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wendy E. Miller
Wendy E. Miller WISSING MILLER LLP31 Hudson Yards, 11th FloorIndustrious at Hudson YardsNew York, NY 10001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Doors; industrial doors; door sections in the nature of panels; openable wall sections, door leaves, door frames and door panels; non-electric wires and rails; sealing frames and protective frames for doors and walls; parts and structural components of the aforementioned goods; all the aforementioned goods consisting of or mainly consisting of metal | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2020 |
| 019 | Doors; industrial doors; door sections in the nature of panels; openable wall sections, door leaves, door frames and door panels; non-electric wires and rails; sealing frames and protective frames for doors and walls; parts and structural components of the aforementioned goods; all the aforementioned goods consisting mostly of non-metal | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 6, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2025 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Feb 10, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 5, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |