Drawing for HBI

USPTO serial 90739769

HBI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VAUSS, JERAMEY WALLACE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HBI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MIGUEL VILLARREAL, JR.

Miguel Villarreal, Jr. GUNN, LEE & CAVE, P.C.8023 VANTAGE DRIVESUITE 1500SAN ANTONIO, TX 78230

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Import agency services in the field of various food products with a wide range of bakery, food service and retail food productsACTIVE—
039Import and export services, namely, transportation of the merchandise of others in the nature of various food products with a wide range of bakery, food service and retail food products; Distribution services, namely, delivery of various food products with a wide range of bakery, food service and retail food productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 19, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 6, 2023ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 6, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 26, 2023EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 16, 2023GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 16, 2023GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 16, 2023CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 7, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2023EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 7, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 7, 2023EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 7, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 7, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 7, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 12, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 11, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 31, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance