USPTO serial 90741818
PLAYSEE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DETMER, CAROLYN ROSE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLAYSEE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Cayman, KY
Grand Cayman, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hui Zhang
Hui Zhang RABIN & BERDO, P.C.2650 Park Tower Drive, Suite 800Vienna, VA 22180United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial transaction processing services, namely, providing secure electronic transactions and payment options, at point of sale and online via a global computer network or via telecommunication, mobile or wireless devices; Electronic processing of bill payment data for users of the internet and communication networks; Electronic funds transfer services; Electronic credit card, debit card, and gift card transaction processing services; Providing financial services, namely, credit card transaction processing and authorization services, issuing of credit cards and check payment guarantee services, payment processing services in the field of credit card, tax and insurance payment, payment verification services, payment card transaction authorization, reconciling financial transactions via a global computer network, and debt settlement services; Processing electronic payments through electronic wallet services; Payment transaction authentication, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options and debt settlement services; Providing financial information and electronic payment data via a global computer network or via telecommunication, mobile or wireless devices; Providing contactless mobile payments processing through merchants at retail, online and wholesale locations; Digital currency, virtual currency, cryptocurrency, digital and blockchain asset, digitized asset, digital token, crypto token and utility token processing services for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2025 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2025 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2025 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 5, 2024 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 11, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2024 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 6, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 16, 2023 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 28, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 28, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 17, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |