USPTO serial 90742568
BENNY'S ORIGINAL MEAT STRAWS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 748
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BENNY'S ORIGINAL MEAT STRAWS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Holland, PA, US
New Holland, PA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN W. GOLDSCHMIDT, JR.
JOHN W. GOLDSCHMIDT, JR. SMITH BUKOWSKI, LLC1050 SPRING STREETSUITE 1WYOMISSING, PA 19610Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 5, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 21, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 20, 2026 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 25, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 26, 2024 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2024 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2024 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |