USPTO serial 90743888
HEIMAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HEIMAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oro Valley, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JUSTIN JOHANSON
JUSTIN JOHANSON JOHANSON PARKER21920 EAST PEGASUS PARKWAYQUEEN CREEK, AZ 85215UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services, namely, promoting and marketing the goods and services of others in the field of consumer goods via print and electronic media; Advertising and marketing; Advertising, marketing and promotion services in the field of car washing products; Advertising, marketing and promotion services in the field of automotive detailing; Advertising, marketing and promotion services in the field of consumer goods; Advertising, marketing and promotion services in the field of automobile cleaning and detailing products; Computerized on-line retail store services in the field of automobile car washing products; Computerized on-line retail store services in the field of cleansing wipes infused with fragrances and perfumes for automobile detailing; Computerized on-line retail store services in the field of cleansing wipes infused with oils for automobile detailing; On-line retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others; On-line retail store services featuring consumer goods; On-line retail store services featuring cleaning supplies; On-line retail store services featuring cleaners, polishes, all-purpose cleaners, creams for leathers, soaps, conditioners, wax, air freshener supplies, and disposable wipes impregnated with cleansing compounds for automobiles; On-line retail store services featuring cleansing wipes infused with fragrances and perfumes for automobile detailing; On-line retail store services featuring moisture absorbent microfiber towels for automobile use; On-line retail store services featuring automobile cleaning and detailing products; On-line wholesale store services featuring consumer goods; On-line wholesale and retail store services featuring consumer goods; On-line wholesale and retail store services featuring automobile car washing products; Retail store services featuring automobile car washing products; Online advertising and marketing services in the field of fragrant automobile cleaning supplies and products; Online advertising and marketing services in the field of automobile cleaning and detailing products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |