USPTO serial 90743908
MINIMIZE RISK. MAXIMIZE EFFICIENCY.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRYANT, ALEXANDRIA N
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MINIMIZE RISK. MAXIMIZE EFFICIENCY.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Scottsdale, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia Lee
Patricia Lee HUTCHISON & STEFFEN, PLLC10080 WEST ALTA DRIVESUITE 200LAS VEGAS, NV 89145Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer software design; Computer software development; Computer software development in the field of national and international regulatory compliance in the field of finance and industries related thereto; Computer network design and computer software design for the high risk industries in need of compliance protocols to ensure regulatory compliance and avoid doing business with "bad actors"; Design and development of computer software; Design and development of computer software for Risk management software in the anti-money laundering, US Sanctions, and counter-terrorist financing space.; Design and writing of computer software | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2022 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2022 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |