USPTO serial 90746741
DPV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DPV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirsten Kelly
KIRSTEN KELLY KELLY SPORTS AND CONSULTING, INC.43 SEWALL ST. #1MARBLEHEAD, MA 01945UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Carrying cases specially adapted to hold collectible trading cards; Carrying cases specially adapted to hold sports trading cards; Plastic collectible trading card holders; Printed trading cards, other than for games; Printed sports trading cards; Collectible printed trading cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Trading cards for games | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial appraisal and valuation of collectibles, namely, trading cards, memorabilia and related collectibles | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Authentication in the field of grading services for trading cards, collectibles, memorabilia, and autographs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Diamond Legends, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Diamond Legends, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DPV
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 15, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 23, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |