USPTO serial 90750089
WM INCLUSIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WM INCLUSIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Megan L. Martin
MEGAN L. MARTIN WARNERMEDIA LEGAL TM GROUP4000 WARNER BOULEVARD156 BRIDGE BLDG. NORTH, 5TH FLOORBURBANK, CA 91522Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Arranging and conducting of conferences and seminars in the field of promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion; arranging and conducting of courses of instruction in the field of promoting diversity, equity and inclusion; arranging and conducting of seminars and workshops in the field of promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion, consulting services in the field of promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion training; educational services, namely, developing, arranging, and conducting educational conferences and programs and providing courses of instruction in the field of promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion; on-line electronic newsletters delivered by e-mail in the field of promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion; professional coaching services in the field of promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion; providing on-line digital publications in the nature of, namely, online newsletters, written articles, white papers and survey reports in the field of promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion via the internet; arranging and conducting of business conferences in the field of promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion; developing educational manuals for others in the field of promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion; providing on-line newsletters in the field of promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion; providing online newsletters in the field of promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion via e-mail | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |