Drawing for AMOY

USPTO serial 90757571

AMOY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 774
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COUGHLAN, REBECCA D.
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMOY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

OTTO O. LEE

OTTO O. LEE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LLP1871 THE ALAMEDA,SUITE 250SAN JOSE, CA 95126

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Bakery products; Moon cakesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2022OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 24, 2022OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 31, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 11, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 22, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 2021MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance