Drawing for IFLYER

USPTO serial 90757987

IFLYER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, BRIDGET ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IFLYER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David C. Lee

David C. Lee AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP2001 K STREET N.W.ROBERT S. STRAUSS TOWERWASHINGTON, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Flying vehicles, namely, aircrafts, personal aerial vehicles, and tiltrotorsACTIVE—
035Consulting services in the field of marketing of aircrafts, personal aerial vehicles, and tiltrotorsACTIVE—
040Consulting services in the nature of manufacturing process consulting in the field of aircrafts, personal aerial vehicles, and tiltrotors; Consulting services in the field of custom manufacture of aircrafts, personal aerial vehicles, and tiltrotors; Technical consulting relating to the manufacture of aircrafts, personal aerial vehicles, and tiltrotorsACTIVE—
041Providing recognition and incentives by organizing and administering contests to demonstrate excellence in the field of aeronautic engineering, development of new technology in the field of aircrafts and tiltrotorsACTIVE—
042Consulting services in the field of design, development, and engineering of aircrafts, personal aerial vehicles, and tiltrotorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 4, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 4, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2025EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2025AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 20, 2024EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 20, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2024EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2024EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 18, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 5, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2023EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2023EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 3, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 7, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2023EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2023EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 5, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 22, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 18, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 28, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 3, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 3, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 9, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 22, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance