USPTO serial 90758766
MAX-CRAFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAX-CRAFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chino Hills, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Bits for power drills; Drill bits for rock drilling; Drill chucks for power drills; Drill sharpening machines; Drilling machines; Drilling machines and parts therefor; Drilling machines for metalworking; Drilling rigs; Drilling rigs, floating or non-floating; Drills for the mining industry; Agricultural implements, namely, seed drills; Air drills; Blades for power tools; Broaches being machine tools; Buffers being power tools; Centering drilling bits being parts of machines; Chucks for power drills; Core drilling bits; Earth drilling machines; Electric hand-held drills; Electrical drills; Extension bars for power tools; Extensions for power drill bits; Extensions for power tools; Grinders being power tools; Machine tools, namely, chasers; Metalworking machine tools; Milling-drilling machines; Mining drill sharpeners; Oil field equipment, namely, drilling rig mechanical handling machines and devices; Oil field equipment, namely, drilling rig mechanization machines and devices; Pneumatic hand-held drills; Polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) drill bits for drilling machines; Power drill bit extensions; Power drill bits; Power drill accessories, namely, non-electrical adapters for use in joining extensions and power drill bits; Power operated metalworking machine tools, namely, boring tools; Power operated metalworking machine tools, namely, drilling tools; Power operated metalworking machine tools, namely, milling tools; Power operated metalworking machine tools, namely, turning tools; Power tools, namely, drill presses; Power tools, namely, hammer drills; Power-operated drilling rigs; Power-operated percussion hammer drills; Power-operated tools, namely, drill hammers; Precision machine tools, namely, hard metal tools, high speed steel (HSS) tools, carbide tools, ceramic tools, poly crystalline diamond (PCD) tools, and diamond-coated and diamond-uncoated tools, and hard metal tools, all for use in the cutting and forming of materials by others; Radial drills; Reamers being machine tools; Rock drills; Seed drills for agricultural machines; Taps being machine tools; Well drilling machines; Wood drilling machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |