Drawing for LIGHTLAB

USPTO serial 90758953

LIGHTLAB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JANSON, ANDREW KYLE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LIGHTLAB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carolyn H. B. Eckart

Carolyn H. B. Eckart ABBOTT LABORATORIES100 Abbott Park RoadAbbott Park, IL 60064United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Education services, namely, providing training of doctors and hospitals for certification in the field of percutaneous coronary interventionACTIVEJan 31, 2019

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2024MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 9, 2024ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 24, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2024CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2024AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 8, 2024SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 20, 2024IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 20, 2024EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 15, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 13, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 20, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 25, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 5, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2023RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 20, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 30, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 14, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 23, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance