Drawing for SUPERMAJOR

USPTO serial 90760964

SUPERMAJOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COGAN, BRITTNEY LORRAINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPERMAJOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James P Marion

James P Marion LAW OFFICES OF JAMES P. MARION, ESQ.81 Compo Road SWestport, CT 06880United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041providing information and news in the field of current events relating to health, wellness, nutrition, medicinal herbs, and therapeutic uses of herbs including hemp and cannabis; providing a website featuring non-downloadable articles in the field of health, wellness, nutrition, medicinal herbs, and therapeutic uses of herbs including hemp and cannabis; providing a website featuring entertainment information in the fields of entertainment events relating to cannabis, hemp, cannabinoids and cannabis products; providing a website featuring news and commentary in the field of entertainment events relating to cannabis, hemp, cannabinoids and cannabis productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 12, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 3, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 30, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 31, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 5, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 16, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 26, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance