Drawing for XTRACTOR

USPTO serial 90761114

XTRACTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KERTGATE, AMY L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XTRACTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ABIGAIL RUBINSTEIN

340 MADISON AVENEW YORK CITY, NY 10173-1922UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical devices, namely, tools in the nature of mechanical dilator sheaths and motorized dilator sheaths for the removal of cardiac leads, indwelling catheters, and for removing foreign objects from the bodyACTIVEApr 5, 2022

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2024MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 25, 2024EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 25, 2024EXDDEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED—
Jun 24, 2024ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 24, 2024RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Apr 24, 2024RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2024RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Apr 24, 2024GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2024GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2024CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 27, 2024EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 27, 2024JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 27, 2024EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 26, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2024ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2023XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Dec 26, 2023XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 27, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 27, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 30, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2022ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 6, 2022AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2022IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Nov 15, 2022AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 15, 2022IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 14, 2022EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 1, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance