USPTO serial 90762088
NEO-GRID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEO-GRID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL E. ZALL
MICHAEL E. ZALL MICHAEL E. ZALL LAW FIRM100 MARKET STREETSUITE 134MONTVALE, NJ 07645Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Modular mobile charging stations to supply electric power to electric vehicles batteries; mobile batteries to supply electric power to off-grid markets; mobile plug-in electric power charging stations to charge electric automobiles; freestanding electric vehicle charging stations not connected to an electric utility grid system; downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for monitoring electric charge in mobile electric storage vehicles and charging stations for electric vehicles | ABANDONED | — |
| 012 | Motor vehicles for use in transporting and connecting mobile energy storage systems to electric vehicle charging stations; motor vehicles for use in transporting and connecting mobile energy storage systems to electric vehicle batteries; motor vehicles featuring mobile energy storage systems for use in charging other electric vehicles and charging electric vehicle storage stations; motor vehicles for use in transporting and connecting mobile energy storage systems to predetermined points of use; motor vehicles for use in transporting and connecting mobile energy storage systems to renewable energy facilities | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2023 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 5, 2023 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 30, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |