USPTO serial 90767951
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Hunan Province, CN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Haoyi Chen
HAOYI CHEN ARCH & LAKE, LLP (HOUSTON OFFICE)2500 WILCREST DRIVE, SUITE 301 AHOUSTON, TX 77042UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Lamps; Searchlights; Air-conditioning apparatus; Air purifying apparatus and machines; Aquarium lights; Bicycle lights; Ceiling fans; Ceiling fans with integrated lights; Ceiling lights; Cooking stoves; Electric fans; Electric lamps; Electric torches for lighting; Fairy lights for festive decoration; Fans for air conditioning apparatus; Headlights for automobiles; Lamp shades; Lampshade holders; LED (light emitting diode) lighting fixtures; LED light bulbs; Light bulbs; Lighting apparatus, namely, lighting installations; Lights, electric, for Christmas trees; Solar light fixtures, namely, indoor and outdoor solar powered lighting units and fixtures; Ultraviolet ray lamps, not for medical purposes; USB-powered desktop fans; Wall lamps; table lamps | PARTIALLY PAID | Apr 27, 2021 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2022 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |