USPTO serial 90769778
TACTICAL ORCHESTRATION MANAGER T-O-M
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HILLIARD, JESSICA LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TACTICAL ORCHESTRATION MANAGER T-O-M?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charlene A. Azema
CHARLENE A. AZEMA KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN STREET, 14TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; Communications hardware; Computer software; Downloadable software; Non-downloadable software; Hardware; Software; Telecommunications and data networking hardware; Wireless adapters; Computers and peripheral devices; Computer hardware equipment used in communications technology networks; Software for operating communications technology networks; Broadband power line communication systems; Modems; Broadband wireless equipment; Telecommunications base station equipment for cellular and fixed networking and communications applications; Internet hardware; Broadband radios; Software platform for telecommunications | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Communication services; 5G network services; Network communication services; Radio communications; Satellite communications; Telecommunication services; Providing user access to global computer networks; Providing internet access; Internet services provider (ISP); Providing multiple-user access to the Internet; Providing private and secure real time electronic communication over a computer network; Video communication services; Providing virtual private network (VPN) services, namely, private and secure electronic communications over a private or public computer network; Telecommunication and internet consultation; Communications by computer terminals; Provision of access to electronic files; Information transmission by telematic codes; Electronic data transmission; Private communications network; Wireless broadband communication services; Transmission of voice, audio, graphics, images, and data by telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, the internet, information services networks and data networks; Digital network telecommunications services; Electronic exchange of data stored in databases accessible via telecommunication networks; Providing access to telecommunication networks; Providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; Telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, audio, data, graphics, images, sound and video by means of broadband power line or wireless networks; Wireless broadband communication services; Broadband radio communication services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |